Search for a law firm
January, 8 2019
December, 18 2018
EU Commission publishes proposal for a Regulation on European Crowdfunding Service Providers for Business
Τhis article was written by Mikiel Calleja and Maria Refalo
Crowdfunding is the raising of money from individuals, to fund a project or carry out a venture.Carried out online, crowdfunding is advantageous because it has the potential to help better match investors with business projects in need of funding with crowdfunding platforms acting as an intermediary between investors and business. As such, it is becoming increasingly important to start-up companies and early stage companies, as a source of non-banking finance.
On 8 March 2018, the European Commission presented a proposal for a Regulation on European Crowdfunding Service Providers for Business. The proposal itself forms part of many measures that would help promote a capital markets union, together with the Communications "Completing Capital Markets Union by 2019 – time to accelerate delivery", to promote access to finance for start-up companies, and other companies across the European Union (EU).
There are four forms through which crowdfunding can function: donation-based, rewards-based, loan-based, and investment/equity-based.Donation-and reward-based crowdfunding are excluded from the proposal, as the latter does not deal with financial products and the information asymmetries that these products create. What the proposal does contemplate is lending-based crowdfunding and investment-based crowdfunding, since they are comparable business funding alternatives.
The proposal does not apply to those services provided to project owners qualifying as consumers as defined in Article 3(a) of Directive 2008/48/EC. Therefore, the proposal does not include consumers lending for consumption purposes as this is not business lending.
So far, crowdfunding services have not been targeted by any centralised EU action, with national frameworks causing fragmentation. Differences between Member States' legislation hindered crowdfunding providers from operating across the EU due to the need for constant alignment to national laws when entering a particular Member State (particularly in the field of marketing and consumer protection).
The proposal does not change or interfere with present national legislation or existing licenses, but provides an opportunity for platforms that want to scale up their operations to a European level and wish to conduct cross-border business.
The initiative is also part of the European Commission's FinTech Action Plan, designed to better understand and enable technology to support the financial services sector. The Commission aims to opt for a more innovation-oriented approach to FinTech by facilitating a regulatory environment where innovative financial services, products and solutions can be rolled out across the EU in a safe, financially-stable environment for investors and firms alike.
The proposal imposes a one million Euro threshold for a maximum consideration for each crowdfunding offer, given the risks associated with the investment, to protect investors.Deposits or other repayable funds are prohibited unless authorised as a credit institution, which is calculated over a period of 12 months regarding a crowdfunding project .
Crowdfunding service providers should operate as a neutral intermediary between its clients.Certain requirements should be laid down to prevent conflicts of interest, such as, for instance, that the crowdfunding service providers should be prevented from participating in crowdfunding offers on their platforms.Furthermore, shareholders holding 20% or more of share capital or voting rights, managers and employees or any person directly or indirectly controlling crowdfunding platforms, should not act as clients, in relation to the crowdfunding services offered on that crowdfunding platform.Crowdfunding service providers must also ensure fair and non-discriminatory treatment of investors.Providers should not treat any project more favourably by singling it out from other projects that are offered on the provider's platform.However, providers are not prevented from mentioning successfully closed offers in which investments through the platform are no longer possible.
Crowdfunding service providers must always comply with the organisational requirement, whilst natural persons who manage the crowdfunding service provider, must have appropriate skills and professional experience . With regards to authorisation to provide crowdfunding services, a legal person must first apply to the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA) . Prospective crowdfunding service providers are to provide proof of absence of criminal records in respect of convictions or penalties of national rules in force, for all the persons involved in the management of the prospective crowdfunding service provider .
It is being proposed that ESMA would have the competence to grant authorisation and ensure compliance of crowdfunding service providers.ESMA would have the authority to request information, carry out general investigations and on-site inspections, issue public notices and warnings, and impose sanctions.ESMA would also have the power to withdraw the authorisation in any of the situations provided by the proposal .A register of all the crowdfunding service providers would be available online and kept regularly updated by ESMA. ESMA also has a supervisory role on crowdfunding services , and is authorised to charge fees to the directly supervised entities to cover costs.
All information provided to clients about the service providers, charges related to crowdfunding services or investment conditions or nature and risks associated with crowdfunding, must be clear, comprehensible, complete and correct.This information is to be provided to potential clients before they enter into a crowdfunding transaction, and such information must be available on the website of the crowdfunding platform .Before giving access to the offers, the crowdfunding service provider must assess whether the services offered are appropriate for the prospective investors.The providers are to request information about the investor's basic knowledge and understanding of the risk in investing and in the types of investments offered on the crowdfunding platform including information about the prospective investor's past investments in transferable securities or loan agreements, and any relevant knowledge or professional experience in relation to crowdfunding investments .
Crowdfunding service providers must also offer prospective investors and current investors, the possibility to simulate their ability to bear loss, calculated at 10% of their net worth, based on (a) regular income and total income, and whether it is earned on a permanent or temporary basis; (b) assets, including financial investments, personal and investment property, pension funds and any cash deposits; and (c) financial commitments, including regular, existing or future.
Member States are in favour of the proposal to facilitate cross-border opportunities.However, most of them would prefer EU harmonised rules rather than having both the national regime and the cross-border regime available at the same time.Member States are also disagreeing on the proposed competence that is to be given to ESMA, stating that supervisory powers should be left in the hands of the national competent authorities.There is also disagreement on the one million Euro threshold, in respect of which several Member States have stated that such a threshold is too low and should be raised to eight million Euro to be in line with the Prospectus.
On 29 August, the ECON Committee of the European Parliament published its draft report where several changes were introduced. One of the main changes was the increase in the above-mentioned threshold to eight million Euro. The European Parliament rapporteur is also of the opinion that the national competent authorities should hold primary supervisory responsibility for the application of the regulation, rather than ESMA as suggested by the Commission, as well as to make available offerings of services across the EU by non-EU platforms, if they are authorised to do so by their competent authority in the non-EU country, and measures are in place to ensure equivalence of standards.
The report also proposed that there ought to be a distinction between platforms facilitating the matching of investors and project owners, and platforms that determine the pricing and packaging of offers by requiring different disclosure requirements for each, rather than the investment and lending based distinction that was made in the proposal.
Another change that was proposed regarded initial coin offerings.It was proposed that initial coin offerings would have to comply with certain initial standards and protections, according to the draft report.This would enable initial coin offerings that want to prove their legitimacy, to comply with the requirements of this Regulation.
 Article 2(2)(d) of the proposed Regulation
 Article 10
 Article 10(1).
 Article 10(3)(a)
 Article 13(1)
 Article 12
 Article 14
 Article 15(2)